H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Adrian Voinea vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 0-1

Mark Woodforde holds a 1–0 lead over Adrian Voinea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1995 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Adrian Voinea
ROU Age 52 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #28 7-5 6-3 Adrian Voinea #176 Match data Apr 26, 1995* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Adrian Voinea #1,046 #36 957 1,755 126 168 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Adrian Voinea Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1994 2–4 33.3% #202 1,492 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1995 13–19 40.6% #56 1,567 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 1996 28–25 52.8% #45 1,709 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1997 12–20 37.5% #139 1,629 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 1998 11–9 55.0% #71 1,675 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 1999 14–21 40.0% #100 1,650 0 1 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 2000 9–20 31.0% #110 1,552 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 2001 11–11 50.0% #97 1,625 0 1 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 2002 18–20 47.4% #68 1,635 0 1 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 2003 8–19 29.6% #154 1,531 0 1 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Adrian Voinea Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1994 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 1996 10 7 17 58.8% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1997 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1998 4 4 8 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2001 5 6 11 45.5% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 2003 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 47 61 108 43.5% 65 75 140 46.4% 5 14 19 26.3% 9 18 27 33.3% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 259/294 of Adrian Voinea's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Adrian Voinea Mark Woodforde
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1994 5/6 2.0 0.6 66.1% 60.2% 41.2% 41.5% 51.4% 53.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 28/32 5.8 3.0 59.0% 67.6% 51.2% 59.1% 44.9% 60.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 46/53 5.2 2.9 58.6% 68.6% 50.9% 57.9% 40.5% 61.3% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 30/32 5.9 3.4 56.9% 64.2% 45.8% 47.6% 40.5% 56.2% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 16/20 4.8 2.4 56.2% 67.6% 53.3% 60.5% 52.9% 61.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 31/35 5.5 3.1 53.9% 69.8% 49.1% 49.1% 46.5% 60.0% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 25/29 6.1 3.4 58.8% 69.5% 45.7% 51.9% 36.5% 59.7% 33.6% 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7%
26 2001 20/22 4.6 3.1 53.8% 70.6% 49.8% 50.7% 42.8% 61.4% 38.4% 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2%
27 2002 32/38 6.2 4.2 54.9% 69.6% 50.0% 54.7% 34.0% 60.6% 36.5% 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5%
28 2003 26/27 5.6 3.8 56.6% 68.5% 46.9% 50.4% 49.2% 58.9% 33.1% 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6%
Career — 259/294 5.5 3.2 56.9% 68.3% 49.0% 53.3% 42.5% 59.9% 36.6% — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Adrian Voinea Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1994 1493 101.4 -1.67 -1.23 0.933 48.4% — +28 — 33.3% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.43 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07
20 1995 1567 132.5 -0.38 -0.66 0.956 49.2% -80 +132 — 46.5% -0.26 3–8 (27%) 8–7 (53%) 100.6 +0.33 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28
21 1996 1710 138.7 -0.34 -0.30 0.952 49.5% -44 +61 -144 54.8% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 12–9 (57%) 102.7 -0.48 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67
22 1997 1629 126.5 -4.51 +0.39 0.866 47.2% +72 +45 -86 35.9% -0.96 4–6 (40%) 6–9 (40%) 95.6 -1.87 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00
23 1998 1675 130.7 -0.22 -0.64 0.938 49.0% +39 +25 — 51.1% -0.13 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.07 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09
24 1999 1651 125.5 -1.16 -0.03 0.943 48.8% -39 +66 — 43.6% -0.42 8–11 (42%) 8–7 (53%) 97.4 -0.55 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18
25 2000 1553 120.2 -1.75 -2.79 0.834 46.7% +49 +58 — 34.3% -1.00 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 102.5 -0.04 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26
26 2001 1625 126.7 -0.04 -0.19 0.995 49.0% -8 +38 — 43.5% -0.44 3–2 (60%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 +0.45 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48
27 2002 1636 128.1 -1.48 -0.75 0.926 48.6% +17 +4 -151 47.2% -0.24 8–5 (62%) 11–8 (58%) 106.0 -0.15 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21
28 2003 1531 117.5 -3.51 -2.55 0.805 46.6% +84 +19 — 37.9% -0.88 2–4 (33%) 9–6 (60%) 98.3 -0.56 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85
32 2007 1495 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
Career — 1756 133.6 -1.52 -0.78 0.913 48.4% +4 +53 -131 44.5% -0.43 43–49 (47%) 63–54 (54%) 104.1 -0.85 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.