H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Agustin Calleri vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 0-1

Daniel Gimeno-Traver holds a 1–0 lead over Agustin Calleri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2006 Chile Open round of 32 1-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Agustin Calleri
ARG Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #187 1-6 6-3 6-3 Agustin Calleri #56 Match data Feb 2, 2006* R32 Chile Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Agustin Calleri #894 #16 1,405 1,901 201 184 52.2% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Agustin Calleri Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
22 1999 3–3 50.0% #140 1,538 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2000 11–5 68.8% #62 1,753 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2001 11–16 40.7% #67 1,658 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2002 25–23 52.1% #50 1,722 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2003 33–23 58.9% #24 1,739 0 1 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2004 20–18 52.6% #58 1,707 0 1 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2005 21–21 50.0% #51 1,667 0 1 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2006 30–19 61.2% #29 1,800 0 2 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2007 23–24 48.9% #42 1,736 0 2 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2008 21–22 48.8% #60 1,635 0 2 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2009 3–10 23.1% #391 1,567 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Agustin Calleri Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 3 2 5 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 10 9 19 52.6% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2003 6 11 17 35.3% 24 9 33 72.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 10 9 19 52.6% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 5 9 14 35.7% 15 11 26 57.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 10 9 19 52.6% 19 7 26 73.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 14 11 25 56.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2008 7 10 17 41.2% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 80 144 44.4% 128 88 216 59.3% 4 10 14 28.6% 5 6 11 45.5% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 365/385 of Agustin Calleri's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Agustin Calleri Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
22 1999 5/6 7.8 1.6 49.0% 79.9% 50.9% 68.6% 47.6% 65.3% 45.4% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2000 15/16 9.6 3.8 47.9% 81.2% 52.0% 56.8% 40.6% 65.7% 40.1% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2001 23/27 5.6 2.7 57.2% 75.7% 51.0% 58.0% 39.0% 64.9% 38.0% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2002 41/48 5.0 3.6 57.8% 73.8% 50.9% 57.5% 43.8% 63.7% 39.2% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2003 54/56 6.8 3.8 53.1% 76.7% 48.8% 59.6% 44.9% 63.7% 41.1% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2004 36/38 7.5 3.3 56.7% 75.4% 51.6% 64.5% 37.1% 64.9% 37.1% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2005 42/42 6.8 3.1 56.4% 71.3% 51.3% 52.6% 43.0% 62.4% 37.7% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2006 49/49 7.0 3.0 57.0% 76.5% 50.4% 56.2% 44.4% 65.5% 39.4% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2007 47/47 7.8 4.0 54.9% 75.4% 50.7% 53.2% 42.9% 64.2% 38.0% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2008 40/43 8.3 3.4 55.4% 77.2% 49.0% 63.2% 41.5% 64.7% 37.7% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2009 13/13 4.8 4.7 55.5% 67.6% 44.7% 49.3% 45.5% 57.2% 30.6% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 365/385 7.0 3.4 55.4% 75.3% 50.2% 57.7% 42.6% 64.0% 38.5% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Agustin Calleri Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 1538 122.4 +0.86 +0.69 1.308 55.5% — +42 — 50.0% +0.72 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.19 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2000 1753 146.3 +3.18 +2.03 1.169 53.0% -151 +44 — 64.4% +0.84 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.7 -0.77 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2001 1658 135.7 +2.07 0.00 1.082 51.1% -52 +70 — 51.5% +0.25 1–8 (11%) 10–6 (63%) 95.6 -0.30 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2002 1722 142.0 +1.83 +1.39 1.081 51.0% -41 +28 — 54.5% +0.33 7–7 (50%) 7–10 (41%) 98.7 -0.72 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2003 1739 148.4 +2.26 +2.83 1.132 52.2% -104 +164 — 55.0% +0.42 9–4 (69%) 10–10 (50%) 105.1 -0.84 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2004 1707 140.0 +1.67 +0.05 1.057 50.8% -12 +105 — 55.4% +0.44 7–9 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 96.2 +0.31 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2005 1667 137.9 +0.94 +0.15 1.004 49.9% -15 +111 — 53.0% +0.10 8–8 (50%) 11–7 (61%) 101.6 -0.07 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2006 1801 146.8 +3.22 +2.10 1.140 52.3% -82 +119 -294 57.9% +0.61 8–4 (67%) 11–10 (52%) 105.7 -1.82 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2007 1736 139.7 +1.51 +0.68 1.061 50.9% -15 +53 -265 50.0% +0.06 8–10 (44%) 11–11 (50%) 97.8 +0.74 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2008 1636 136.1 +0.96 +0.27 1.067 50.9% +15 +88 — 48.6% +0.21 5–7 (42%) 4–10 (29%) 93.9 -0.04 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2009 1567 117.8 -3.27 -3.84 0.716 44.8% +53 +93 — 20.0% -1.87 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1902 148.0 +1.70 +0.95 1.072 51.1% -40 +92 -280 52.7% +0.27 58–62 (48%) 75–80 (48%) 98.9 -0.89 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.