H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Carlos Costa H2H: 1-3
Carlos Costa holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carlos Costa leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Costa won the 1996 Indian Wells Masters fourth round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 1996* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Carlos Costa | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1996* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Albert Costa | 7-5 6-4 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1995* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Carlos Costa | 6-3 6-3 | Albert Costa | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1994* | Estoril | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Carlos Costa | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 |