H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 0-1
Daniel Vacek holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 US Open first round 7-5 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 7-5 6-3 7-5 | Albert Costa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |