H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Albert Costa vs Jordi Arrese H2H: 2-0
Albert Costa holds a 2–0 lead over Jordi Arrese in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Costa leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 1996 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1996* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-2 6-0 | Jordi Arrese | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1995* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Costa | 6-4 7-6(4) | Jordi Arrese | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
| Jordi Arrese | #775 | #23 | 1,077 | 1,831 | 213 | 207 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Costa | Jordi Arrese | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #831 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #214 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #97 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #44 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #39 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #23 | 1,806 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 | 1992 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,724 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 | 1993 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 | 1994 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 | 1995 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 | 1996 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #645 | 1,502 | 0 | 6 |