H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Albert Montanes vs Albert Portas H2H: 1-0
Albert Montanes holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Portas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2001 Bucharest fourth round 6-4 4-6 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2001* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Montanes | 6-4 4-6 7-6(7) | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Montanes | Albert Portas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |