H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Albert Montanes vs Alberto Martin H2H: 2-3

Alberto Martin holds a 3–2 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Alberto Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Martin won the 2006 Dutch Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Alberto Martin
ESP Age 48 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alberto Martin #49 6-2 6-2 Albert Montanes #95 Match data Jul 20, 2006* R32 Dutch Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Alberto Martin #56 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 Albert Montanes #62 Match data Apr 7, 2005* R32 Valencia ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Albert Montanes #82 6-3 6-2 Alberto Martin #56 Match data Apr 30, 2004* R16 Barcelona Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Albert Montanes #110 4-6 6-2 6-2 Alberto Martin #58 Match data Apr 17, 2004* SF Valencia International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Alberto Martin #69 7-6(2) 6-2 Albert Montanes #59 Match data Aug 21, 2002* R64 Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,916 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Alberto Martin #1,023 #34 1,008 1,801 218 267 44.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Montanes Alberto Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1996 2–3 40.0% #226 1,502 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1997 9–13 40.9% #111 1,546 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1998 1–7 12.5% #105 1,490 0 0
20 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,677 0 0 1999 27–21 56.2% #57 1,712 0 2
21 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,605 0 0 2000 20–28 41.7% #79 1,608 0 2
22 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,552 0 0 2001 32–26 55.2% #41 1,675 0 3
23 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,530 0 0 2002 23–24 48.9% #61 1,700 0 3
24 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0 2003 19–26 42.2% #54 1,654 0 3
25 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0 2004 23–26 46.9% #68 1,623 0 3
26 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0 2005 25–29 46.3% #50 1,660 0 3
27 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1 2006 18–22 45.0% #61 1,623 0 3
28 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,799 0 3 2007 5–12 29.4% #143 1,623 0 3
29 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,866 0 5 2008 2–6 25.0% #100 1,644 0 3
30 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5 2009 7–20 25.9% #128 1,585 0 3
31 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5 2010 5–4 55.6% #243 1,591 0 3
32 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,742 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Montanes Alberto Martin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 — — — — 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 20 11 31 64.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
21 2002 2 8 10 20.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 6 15 21 28.6% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2003 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 9 10 19 47.4% 13 13 26 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 9 16 25 36.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 8 9 17 47.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 8 11 19 42.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2007 2 8 10 20.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 20 14 34 58.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2008 5 11 16 31.3% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2006 2 8 10 20.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2009 6 10 16 37.5% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
29 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 23 12 35 65.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 6 6 0.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — —
32 2013 0 6 6 0.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 86 124 30.6% 213 186 399 53.4% 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — 53 100 153 34.6% 156 146 302 51.7% 8 16 24 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/544 of Albert Montanes's and 449/485 of Alberto Martin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Montanes Alberto Martin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 4/5 0.8 3.5 59.4% 60.1% 55.1% 46.5% 46.6% 58.0% 37.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 20/22 1.9 3.5 65.7% 60.6% 50.2% 60.8% 48.0% 56.7% 42.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 8/8 1.0 3.8 62.4% 57.5% 33.5% 49.3% 47.5% 48.2% 33.0%
20 2001 16/20 4.3 3.1 59.8% 70.4% 56.0% 67.3% 47.4% 64.6% 43.8% 1999 37/48 1.8 3.0 66.5% 64.6% 47.3% 57.7% 45.2% 58.8% 39.8%
21 2002 38/41 3.6 2.9 62.0% 69.0% 49.1% 67.8% 40.7% 61.4% 34.4% 2000 40/48 1.8 3.1 63.4% 63.5% 50.4% 50.5% 43.4% 58.5% 39.6%
22 2003 25/26 4.1 3.4 60.1% 70.8% 48.2% 59.0% 45.5% 61.3% 37.3% 2001 51/58 2.4 4.5 59.3% 68.8% 50.1% 54.3% 50.0% 61.0% 40.1%
23 2004 28/28 2.5 2.5 63.3% 62.9% 45.8% 50.3% 45.0% 56.7% 34.4% 2002 41/47 1.9 3.4 62.0% 63.3% 49.9% 51.6% 41.8% 58.0% 39.4%
24 2005 29/29 4.2 2.5 62.1% 65.9% 50.2% 52.3% 39.3% 59.9% 35.6% 2003 44/45 1.5 3.9 62.3% 66.4% 48.8% 54.8% 42.5% 59.6% 38.7%
25 2006 29/29 3.2 3.6 57.7% 67.3% 47.9% 48.2% 43.8% 58.5% 37.9% 2004 49/49 2.2 4.0 60.3% 67.0% 49.2% 54.1% 44.7% 59.7% 38.3%
26 2007 44/48 3.2 3.3 60.3% 69.4% 48.9% 56.0% 38.4% 61.2% 34.9% 2005 54/54 2.4 3.3 53.7% 67.2% 50.3% 58.2% 44.7% 59.2% 40.7%
27 2008 47/47 3.1 3.7 58.4% 72.3% 50.9% 55.6% 37.3% 63.5% 37.2% 2006 40/40 2.9 3.0 57.9% 66.0% 49.7% 54.4% 41.3% 58.7% 37.8%
28 2009 45/46 3.3 3.0 58.1% 71.4% 50.0% 58.2% 47.4% 62.3% 38.6% 2007 17/17 1.8 2.8 57.0% 63.6% 44.7% 50.8% 37.8% 55.8% 39.0%
29 2010 61/62 4.0 2.5 61.6% 71.4% 52.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.9% 38.4% 2008 8/8 2.5 2.5 56.4% 66.0% 49.5% 40.2% 36.6% 58.9% 37.0%
30 2011 46/47 3.5 4.0 58.3% 69.4% 48.4% 58.1% 41.5% 60.7% 38.5% 2009 27/27 1.7 2.7 59.1% 64.4% 50.0% 53.6% 35.1% 58.5% 34.5%
31 2012 23/23 1.7 3.4 61.5% 60.0% 47.8% 46.7% 47.8% 55.3% 36.4% 2010 9/9 1.3 2.2 65.5% 62.4% 49.5% 48.5% 57.3% 58.4% 36.5%
32 2013 37/37 3.9 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 51.2% 60.5% 40.5% 61.0% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 29/29 1.9 3.0 62.6% 68.1% 48.9% 60.0% 45.5% 60.8% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 15/15 2.6 3.7 57.9% 68.3% 46.1% 55.1% 31.5% 58.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 15/15 3.3 3.0 59.4% 73.7% 53.9% 41.5% 43.4% 65.3% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 2/2 1.5 2.0 53.4% 64.2% 37.7% 59.9% 45.5% 51.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 529/544 3.3 3.2 60.3% 68.9% 49.7% 56.7% 42.5% 61.1% 36.8% — 449/485 2.0 3.4 60.4% 65.3% 49.2% 54.1% 43.9% 58.7% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Montanes Alberto Martin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1502 99.4 -0.97 -1.12 0.900 47.9% — +22 — 41.7% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.32
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1547 128.2 -2.35 +1.69 0.970 49.5% — +31 — 43.6% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.1 -0.18
19 2000 1499 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1490 102.2 -4.79 -2.31 0.636 40.9% 0 +67 — 15.8% -2.68 1–0 0–1 — +0.15
20 2001 1678 136.6 +1.82 +3.16 1.237 54.2% — +40 — 57.7% +0.83 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.7 -0.51 1999 1712 133.5 -2.31 +1.21 0.966 49.4% -216 +60 -76 52.6% +0.09 7–4 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 106.0 +0.83
21 2002 1605 126.3 -0.60 -2.91 0.890 48.2% -122 +86 — 40.8% -0.64 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 99.3 +0.28 2000 1608 131.3 -2.69 +0.88 0.955 49.2% -119 +143 -2 41.2% -0.49 6–7 (46%) 5–7 (42%) 98.4 -0.40
22 2003 1553 119.1 -1.19 -1.31 0.966 49.1% -72 +70 — 43.8% -0.41 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.10 2001 1675 140.9 -0.51 +1.16 1.030 50.5% -64 +114 — 53.7% +0.11 11–13 (46%) 9–2 (82%) 105.2 +0.86
23 2004 1531 123.5 -3.68 -2.67 0.795 45.5% -81 +112 — 35.8% -1.18 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 -0.26 2002 1700 141.3 -2.44 +1.41 0.938 48.5% -17 +63 — 46.8% -0.34 6–4 (60%) 9–7 (56%) 106.0 -2.23
24 2005 1578 129.8 -1.65 -2.07 0.887 47.7% -123 +44 — 39.4% -0.73 3–8 (27%) 6–3 (67%) 97.8 -0.48 2003 1655 124.7 -1.98 +0.48 0.958 49.2% +14 +19 — 42.3% -0.50 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) 94.6 +0.26
25 2006 1558 114.9 -2.47 -0.35 0.913 47.9% -140 +77 — 34.8% -1.07 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +0.20 2004 1623 133.1 -2.39 +1.11 0.951 48.9% -29 +128 — 44.9% -0.43 12–10 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.7 -0.50
26 2007 1657 136.8 -1.46 -1.42 0.898 48.4% -226 +127 — 46.5% -0.51 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 103.0 -0.96 2005 1660 145.8 -1.58 +2.44 0.998 50.0% -76 +132 -211 42.5% -0.53 9–4 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 105.4 -1.73
27 2008 1726 137.6 +0.23 +0.36 1.018 50.3% -269 +135 — 50.4% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 14–8 (64%) 108.7 -0.51 2006 1624 129.7 -2.69 +0.56 0.917 48.2% -113 +148 — 45.7% -0.32 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 99.4 -0.43
28 2009 1800 145.9 -0.16 +1.58 1.023 50.4% -267 +114 -233 51.9% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 13–9 (59%) 106.6 +1.21 2007 1624 123.2 -3.59 +1.46 0.881 47.0% -130 +105 — 29.7% -1.49 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -1.47
29 2010 1866 150.2 +0.88 +1.28 1.064 51.3% -133 +83 -229 54.4% +0.29 13–6 (68%) 12–10 (55%) 107.6 +1.82 2008 1645 112.3 -2.97 +0.67 0.900 48.0% — +60 — 33.3% -1.11 0–2 2–2 (50%) — -0.37
30 2011 1732 142.5 -1.48 +0.19 0.979 49.7% -46 +122 — 48.7% +0.12 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 98.8 +2.46 2009 1585 128.0 -3.17 -1.98 0.831 46.5% -33 +62 -107 30.5% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.6 -0.14
31 2012 1634 120.3 -5.00 +0.01 0.814 46.0% -31 +58 — 34.0% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 -1.40 2010 1592 115.8 -2.74 -1.64 0.876 47.6% — +61 — 61.1% +0.78 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +1.05
32 2013 1742 140.9 -1.63 -1.53 0.906 48.5% -191 +144 — 45.1% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 106.9 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1694 140.0 -2.09 -1.88 0.865 47.4% -170 +74 — 45.9% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1697 129.2 -3.02 +0.08 0.916 48.2% — +91 — 48.5% -0.36 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.8 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1637 127.9 +0.93 -1.97 0.987 49.5% — +84 — 47.2% -0.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1613 100.6 -4.34 -0.80 0.755 44.7% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1916 141.7 -1.13 -0.50 0.946 49.0% -161 +96 -231 46.2% -0.31 84–64 (57%) 90–90 (50%) 106.4 +0.73 — 1801 137.1 -2.23 +0.89 0.944 48.8% -68 +90 -94 44.5% -0.43 70–66 (51%) 72–71 (50%) 103.1 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.