H2H data updated: 2026-08-31 00:00 UTC

Albert Montanes vs Bruno Echagaray H2H: 1-0

Albert Montanes holds a 1–0 lead over Bruno Echagaray in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2009 Mexican Open first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Bruno Echagaray
MEX Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Montanes #38 6-1 6-4 Bruno Echagaray #358 Match data Feb 26, 2009* R32 Mexican Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,916 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Bruno Echagaray #1,056 #156 275 1,527 0 4 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Montanes Bruno Echagaray
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,552 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #160 1,517 0 0
25 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,492 0 0
26 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #438 1,446 0 0
27 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,799 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,866 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,742 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Montanes Bruno Echagaray
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2001 — — — — 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 2 8 10 20.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 9 16 25 36.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2007 2 8 10 20.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2008 5 11 16 31.3% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 6 10 16 37.5% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 23 12 35 65.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 0 6 6 0.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 86 124 30.6% 213 186 399 53.4% 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/544 of Albert Montanes's and 4/4 of Bruno Echagaray's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Montanes Bruno Echagaray
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2001 16/20 4.3 3.1 59.8% 70.4% 56.0% 67.3% 47.4% 64.6% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 38/41 3.6 2.9 62.0% 69.0% 49.1% 67.8% 40.7% 61.4% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 25/26 4.1 3.4 60.1% 70.8% 48.2% 59.0% 45.5% 61.3% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 28/28 2.5 2.5 63.3% 62.9% 45.8% 50.3% 45.0% 56.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 29/29 4.2 2.5 62.1% 65.9% 50.2% 52.3% 39.3% 59.9% 35.6% 2007 2/2 2.5 2.5 64.6% 59.2% 44.2% 46.9% 33.3% 53.8% 25.5%
25 2006 29/29 3.2 3.6 57.7% 67.3% 47.9% 48.2% 43.8% 58.5% 37.9% 2008 1/1 0.0 2.0 60.0% 53.8% 38.5% 58.3% 50.0% 47.7% 36.8%
26 2007 44/48 3.2 3.3 60.3% 69.4% 48.9% 56.0% 38.4% 61.2% 34.9% 2009 1/1 1.0 1.0 71.4% 47.5% 37.5% 14.3% 50.0% 44.6% 36.8%
27 2008 47/47 3.1 3.7 58.4% 72.3% 50.9% 55.6% 37.3% 63.5% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 45/46 3.3 3.0 58.1% 71.4% 50.0% 58.2% 47.4% 62.3% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 61/62 4.0 2.5 61.6% 71.4% 52.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 46/47 3.5 4.0 58.3% 69.4% 48.4% 58.1% 41.5% 60.7% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 23/23 1.7 3.4 61.5% 60.0% 47.8% 46.7% 47.8% 55.3% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 37/37 3.9 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 51.2% 60.5% 40.5% 61.0% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 29/29 1.9 3.0 62.6% 68.1% 48.9% 60.0% 45.5% 60.8% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 15/15 2.6 3.7 57.9% 68.3% 46.1% 55.1% 31.5% 58.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 15/15 3.3 3.0 59.4% 73.7% 53.9% 41.5% 43.4% 65.3% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 2/2 1.5 2.0 53.4% 64.2% 37.7% 59.9% 45.5% 51.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 529/544 3.3 3.2 60.3% 68.9% 49.7% 56.7% 42.5% 61.1% 36.8% — 4/4 1.5 2.0 65.2% 54.9% 41.1% 41.6% 41.7% 50.0% 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Montanes Bruno Echagaray
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
19 2000 1499 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1678 136.6 +1.82 +3.16 1.237 54.2% — +40 — 57.7% +0.83 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1605 126.3 -0.60 -2.91 0.890 48.2% -122 +86 — 40.8% -0.64 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 1553 119.1 -1.19 -1.31 0.966 49.1% -72 +70 — 43.8% -0.41 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2004 1531 123.5 -3.68 -2.67 0.795 45.5% -81 +112 — 35.8% -1.18 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) -0.26 2006 1481 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2005 1578 129.8 -1.65 -2.07 0.887 47.7% -123 +44 — 39.4% -0.73 3–8 (27%) 6–3 (67%) -0.48 2007 1517 104.3 -1.30 +0.10 0.553 40.3% — — — 0.0% -3.20 — — -0.17
25 2006 1558 114.9 -2.47 -0.35 0.913 47.9% -140 +77 — 34.8% -1.07 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) +0.20 2008 1493 99.3 -0.68 +1.16 0.704 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — -0.08
26 2007 1657 136.8 -1.46 -1.42 0.898 48.4% -226 +127 — 46.5% -0.51 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) -0.96 2009 1446 99.2 -0.07 -0.89 0.666 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — +0.10
27 2008 1726 137.6 +0.23 +0.36 1.018 50.3% -269 +135 — 50.4% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 14–8 (64%) -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2009 1800 145.9 -0.16 +1.58 1.023 50.4% -267 +114 -233 51.9% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 13–9 (59%) +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2010 1866 150.2 +0.88 +1.28 1.064 51.3% -133 +83 -229 54.4% +0.29 13–6 (68%) 12–10 (55%) +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1732 142.5 -1.48 +0.19 0.979 49.7% -46 +122 — 48.7% +0.12 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) +2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1634 120.3 -5.00 +0.01 0.814 46.0% -31 +58 — 34.0% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1742 140.9 -1.63 -1.53 0.906 48.5% -191 +144 — 45.1% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1694 140.0 -2.09 -1.88 0.865 47.4% -170 +74 — 45.9% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 6–6 (50%) -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1697 129.2 -3.02 +0.08 0.916 48.2% — +91 — 48.5% -0.36 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1637 127.9 +0.93 -1.97 0.987 49.5% — +84 — 47.2% -0.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1613 100.6 -4.34 -0.80 0.755 44.7% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1916 141.7 -1.13 -0.50 0.946 49.0% -161 +96 -231 46.2% -0.31 84–64 (57%) 90–90 (50%) +0.73 — 1527 100.4 -0.84 +0.12 0.624 41.0% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — -3.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.