H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Albert Montanes vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 4-2

Albert Montanes holds a 4–2 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Albert Montanes leads 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2016 Marrakech fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 8, 2016* Marrakech ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Montanes #123 6-4 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #102 Match data
Feb 8, 2013* Santiago ATP 250 R16 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #64 6-4 6-4 Albert Montanes #101 Match data
Feb 23, 2011* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Clay Albert Montanes #25 6-2 6-1 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #59 Match data
May 7, 2010* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Montanes #34 6-1 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #99 Match data
Feb 24, 2010* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Clay Albert Montanes #29 7-5 4-6 6-2 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #79 Match data
Feb 27, 2009* Acapulco ATP 500 R16 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #89 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Albert Montanes #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Montanes Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0
24 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0
25 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0
29 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0
30 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0
31 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0
32 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0
33 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6 — — — — — — —