H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Albert Montanes vs David Sanchez H2H: 1-3
David Sanchez holds a 3–1 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, David Sanchez leads 3–0 on clay, while Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Sanchez won the 2005 Vina Del Mar third round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | David Sanchez | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2003* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | David Sanchez | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| May 3, 2002* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | David Sanchez | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| Jan 3, 2002* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Albert Montanes | 6-3 6-2 | David Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| David Sanchez | #1,116 | #41 | 832 | 1,730 | 87 | 119 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Montanes | David Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #74 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #60 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #50 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |