H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Albert Montanes vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 2-1

Albert Montanes holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Albert Montanes leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2003 Chile Open round of 16 6-7(3) 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Fernando Vicente
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Montanes #81 6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 Fernando Vicente #48 Match data Feb 14, 2003* R16 Chile Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Fernando Vicente #71 7-6(2) 6-1 Albert Montanes #58 Match data May 25, 2002* QF St. Poelten ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Albert Montanes #62 7-6(5) 6-4 Fernando Vicente #63 Match data Feb 15, 2002* R16 Chile Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,916 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Fernando Vicente #1,019 #29 993 1,762 159 213 42.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Montanes Fernando Vicente
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1996 3–3 50.0% #151 1,548 0 0
20 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,677 0 0 1997 9–12 42.9% #121 1,561 0 0
21 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,605 0 0 1998 20–20 50.0% #54 1,649 0 0
22 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,552 0 0 1999 25–29 46.3% #49 1,636 0 1
23 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,530 0 0 2000 24–32 42.9% #47 1,618 0 2
24 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0 2001 23–26 46.9% #52 1,638 0 3
25 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0 2002 23–28 45.1% #58 1,618 0 3
26 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0 2003 20–29 40.8% #63 1,601 0 3
27 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1 2004 4–5 44.4% #187 1,594 0 3
28 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,799 0 3 2005 3–5 37.5% #110 1,614 0 3
29 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,866 0 5 2006 5–17 22.7% #111 1,461 0 3
30 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5 2007 0–5 0.0% #168 1,507 0 3
31 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5 2008 0–1 0.0% #206 1,482 0 3
32 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,742 0 6 2009 0–1 0.0% #420 1,488 0 3
33 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Montanes Fernando Vicente
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 — — — — 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — —
21 2002 2 8 10 20.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 19 17 36 52.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2003 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 4 11 15 26.7% 19 16 35 54.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 9 14 23 39.1% 15 14 29 51.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 9 16 25 36.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 7 9 16 43.8% 16 15 31 51.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2007 2 8 10 20.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 7 12 19 36.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2008 5 11 16 31.3% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
28 2009 6 10 16 37.5% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2005 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
29 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 23 12 35 65.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2013 0 6 6 0.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 86 124 30.6% 213 186 399 53.4% 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — 39 64 103 37.9% 113 128 241 46.9% 5 12 17 29.4% 2 9 11 18.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/544 of Albert Montanes's and 327/372 of Fernando Vicente's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Montanes Fernando Vicente
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 4/6 1.0 2.0 70.7% 62.9% 53.7% 34.5% 38.4% 59.4% 45.4%
20 2001 16/20 4.3 3.1 59.8% 70.4% 56.0% 67.3% 47.4% 64.6% 43.8% 1997 18/21 1.1 2.7 62.5% 64.6% 47.0% 58.3% 48.0% 57.7% 45.2%
21 2002 38/41 3.6 2.9 62.0% 69.0% 49.1% 67.8% 40.7% 61.4% 34.4% 1998 32/40 2.2 2.7 61.9% 62.8% 50.4% 55.1% 44.5% 58.1% 40.8%
22 2003 25/26 4.1 3.4 60.1% 70.8% 48.2% 59.0% 45.5% 61.3% 37.3% 1999 47/54 2.3 3.2 59.8% 66.6% 48.9% 55.3% 46.2% 59.5% 42.0%
23 2004 28/28 2.5 2.5 63.3% 62.9% 45.8% 50.3% 45.0% 56.7% 34.4% 2000 44/56 3.0 3.7 59.2% 66.8% 49.6% 53.0% 41.6% 60.0% 38.9%
24 2005 29/29 4.2 2.5 62.1% 65.9% 50.2% 52.3% 39.3% 59.9% 35.6% 2001 43/49 3.7 3.6 57.7% 69.0% 47.2% 52.5% 48.3% 59.3% 39.6%
25 2006 29/29 3.2 3.6 57.7% 67.3% 47.9% 48.2% 43.8% 58.5% 37.9% 2002 44/51 3.2 1.9 57.4% 67.3% 50.1% 58.6% 46.0% 59.9% 37.2%
26 2007 44/48 3.2 3.3 60.3% 69.4% 48.9% 56.0% 38.4% 61.2% 34.9% 2003 49/49 4.6 2.6 56.4% 68.0% 48.1% 59.2% 43.5% 59.1% 34.8%
27 2008 47/47 3.1 3.7 58.4% 72.3% 50.9% 55.6% 37.3% 63.5% 37.2% 2004 9/9 2.8 1.8 58.8% 63.6% 44.2% 55.6% 42.7% 55.7% 35.8%
28 2009 45/46 3.3 3.0 58.1% 71.4% 50.0% 58.2% 47.4% 62.3% 38.6% 2005 8/8 4.4 2.3 56.9% 64.0% 51.0% 64.0% 35.5% 58.2% 40.7%
29 2010 61/62 4.0 2.5 61.6% 71.4% 52.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.9% 38.4% 2006 22/22 3.0 1.6 64.9% 63.7% 50.1% 53.1% 39.1% 58.8% 36.7%
30 2011 46/47 3.5 4.0 58.3% 69.4% 48.4% 58.1% 41.5% 60.7% 38.5% 2007 5/5 1.4 1.2 70.3% 56.6% 39.1% 52.8% 24.0% 51.3% 25.5%
31 2012 23/23 1.7 3.4 61.5% 60.0% 47.8% 46.7% 47.8% 55.3% 36.4% 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 50.0% 61.8% 44.1% 50.0% 28.6% 52.9% 42.7%
32 2013 37/37 3.9 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 51.2% 60.5% 40.5% 61.0% 35.3% 2009 1/1 1.0 2.0 62.2% 30.4% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 29.7% 27.8%
33 2014 29/29 1.9 3.0 62.6% 68.1% 48.9% 60.0% 45.5% 60.8% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 15/15 2.6 3.7 57.9% 68.3% 46.1% 55.1% 31.5% 58.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 15/15 3.3 3.0 59.4% 73.7% 53.9% 41.5% 43.4% 65.3% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 2/2 1.5 2.0 53.4% 64.2% 37.7% 59.9% 45.5% 51.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 529/544 3.3 3.2 60.3% 68.9% 49.7% 56.7% 42.5% 61.1% 36.8% — 327/372 3.0 2.8 59.5% 66.1% 48.7% 55.4% 43.9% 58.9% 38.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Montanes Fernando Vicente
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2000 1499 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1548 120.0 +0.84 +2.51 1.118 52.2% — +29 — 50.0% 0.00 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.41
20 2001 1678 136.6 +1.82 +3.16 1.237 54.2% — +40 — 57.7% +0.83 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.7 -0.51 1997 1562 130.5 -1.52 +3.50 1.070 51.3% — +52 — 44.4% -0.33 1–6 (14%) 3–1 (75%) 96.3 -0.43
21 2002 1605 126.3 -0.60 -2.91 0.890 48.2% -122 +86 — 40.8% -0.64 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 99.3 +0.28 1998 1650 137.4 -2.98 +1.59 0.974 49.6% -108 +65 — 44.3% -0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 103.1 -0.14
22 2003 1553 119.1 -1.19 -1.31 0.966 49.1% -72 +70 — 43.8% -0.41 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.10 1999 1637 138.5 -1.44 +2.23 1.037 50.6% -86 +109 — 45.6% -0.18 8–6 (57%) 7–12 (37%) 98.8 +0.65
23 2004 1531 123.5 -3.68 -2.67 0.795 45.5% -81 +112 — 35.8% -1.18 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 -0.26 2000 1618 135.8 -1.81 +1.17 0.972 49.6% -34 +61 — 44.7% -0.20 13–15 (46%) 10–12 (45%) 100.4 -0.23
24 2005 1578 129.8 -1.65 -2.07 0.887 47.7% -123 +44 — 39.4% -0.73 3–8 (27%) 6–3 (67%) 97.8 -0.48 2001 1639 132.0 -1.82 +1.08 0.972 49.5% -18 +32 — 45.5% -0.38 10–9 (53%) 12–6 (67%) 103.8 +0.90
25 2006 1558 114.9 -2.47 -0.35 0.913 47.9% -140 +77 — 34.8% -1.07 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +0.20 2002 1618 136.2 -2.20 -0.59 0.927 48.9% +13 +77 — 46.2% -0.27 8–8 (50%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 0.00
26 2007 1657 136.8 -1.46 -1.42 0.898 48.4% -226 +127 — 46.5% -0.51 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 103.0 -0.96 2003 1602 129.5 -1.76 -2.08 0.852 47.4% +2 +46 -97 41.3% -0.65 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 104.2 -2.15
27 2008 1726 137.6 +0.23 +0.36 1.018 50.3% -269 +135 — 50.4% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 14–8 (64%) 108.7 -0.51 2004 1594 106.7 -3.53 -0.58 0.807 45.9% — +61 — 41.7% -1.33 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 102.1 +0.13
28 2009 1800 145.9 -0.16 +1.58 1.023 50.4% -267 +114 -233 51.9% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 13–9 (59%) 106.6 +1.21 2005 1614 114.5 -1.62 +0.57 0.973 49.5% — +61 — 41.7% -0.25 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.35
29 2010 1866 150.2 +0.88 +1.28 1.064 51.3% -133 +83 -229 54.4% +0.29 13–6 (68%) 12–10 (55%) 107.6 +1.82 2006 1462 116.7 -2.31 -0.86 0.891 47.8% +46 +92 +90 32.1% -1.21 0–8 (0%) 2–4 (33%) 90.0 +0.66
30 2011 1732 142.5 -1.48 +0.19 0.979 49.7% -46 +122 — 48.7% +0.12 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 98.8 +2.46 2007 1508 103.6 -3.76 -5.30 0.523 39.6% — 0 — 7.7% -3.62 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
31 2012 1634 120.3 -5.00 +0.01 0.814 46.0% -31 +58 — 34.0% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 -1.40 2008 1483 99.3 -2.70 -2.66 0.907 47.3% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — +0.18
32 2013 1742 140.9 -1.63 -1.53 0.906 48.5% -191 +144 — 45.1% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 106.9 +0.81 2009 1488 93.1 -1.57 -0.72 0.395 28.8% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.06
33 2014 1694 140.0 -2.09 -1.88 0.865 47.4% -170 +74 — 45.9% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.62 2010 1471 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1697 129.2 -3.02 +0.08 0.916 48.2% — +91 — 48.5% -0.36 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.8 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1637 127.9 +0.93 -1.97 0.987 49.5% — +84 — 47.2% -0.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1613 100.6 -4.34 -0.80 0.755 44.7% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1916 141.7 -1.13 -0.50 0.946 49.0% -161 +96 -231 46.2% -0.31 84–64 (57%) 90–90 (50%) 106.4 +0.73 — 1763 134.5 -1.98 +0.46 0.943 49.0% -22 +64 -35 43.1% -0.44 63–68 (48%) 62–72 (46%) 98.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.