H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Montanes vs Guillermo Canas H2H: 1-2
Guillermo Canas holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Canas leads 2–0 on clay, while Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2009 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Albert Montanes | 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Guillermo Canas | Match data |
| May 27, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-1 6-3 6-4 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2002* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Canas | 6-0 6-0 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Guillermo Canas | #1,110 | #8 | 2,075 | 2,008 | 244 | 188 | 56.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Montanes | Guillermo Canas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #129 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #95 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #231 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #272 | 1,805 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #12 | 1,898 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #102 | 1,889 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,821 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #79 | 1,690 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #191 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |