H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Albert Montanes vs Hugo Armando H2H: 1-0
Albert Montanes holds a 1–0 lead over Hugo Armando in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2002 Acapulco third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2002* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Montanes | 6-4 7-6(4) | Hugo Armando | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Hugo Armando | #1,126 | #100 | 403 | 1,581 | 13 | 30 | 30.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Montanes | Hugo Armando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #167 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #161 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #178 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #203 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #227 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #458 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |