H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Albert Montanes vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 3-4

Jose Acasuso holds a 4–3 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay, while Jose Acasuso leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2008 Dutch Open quarterfinal 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main-draw meetings
Jose Acasuso
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Montanes #63 6-0 6-2 Jose Acasuso #54 Match data Jul 19, 2008* QF Dutch Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Albert Montanes #70 6-3 7-6(5) Jose Acasuso #53 Match data Jul 10, 2008* R32 Stuttgart Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Albert Montanes #78 7-6(3) 6-3 Jose Acasuso #45 Match data May 14, 2008* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Jose Acasuso #72 6-1 6-2 Albert Montanes #51 Match data Aug 4, 2007* SF Sopot International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Jose Acasuso #38 6-0 7-5 Albert Montanes #66 Match data Mar 1, 2007* R32 Mexican Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Jose Acasuso #28 6-4 6-3 Albert Montanes #83 Match data Oct 26, 2006* R32 Swiss Indoors ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jose Acasuso #39 6-1 6-3 Albert Montanes #66 Match data Feb 16, 2006* R32 Argentina Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,916 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Jose Acasuso #1,107 #20 1,640 1,830 181 178 50.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Montanes Jose Acasuso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2001 8–12 40.0% #86 1,536 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2002 21–17 55.3% #41 1,666 0 1
20 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,677 0 0 2003 11–19 36.7% #101 1,614 0 1
21 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,605 0 0 2004 18–16 52.9% #67 1,685 0 2
22 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,552 0 0 2005 27–26 50.9% #40 1,725 0 2
23 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,530 0 0 2006 28–20 58.3% #27 1,710 0 3
24 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0 2007 18–19 48.6% #65 1,686 0 3
25 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0 2008 26–24 52.0% #48 1,697 0 3
26 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0 2009 21–21 50.0% #51 1,733 0 3
27 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1 2010 1–3 25.0% #253 1,667 0 3
28 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,799 0 3 2011 2–1 66.7% #255 1,657 0 3
29 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,866 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,742 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Montanes Jose Acasuso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2001 — — — — 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 8 11 27.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 2 8 10 20.0% 15 15 30 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 18 11 29 62.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2003 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 6 10 16 37.5% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 9 16 25 36.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 5 7 12 41.7% 13 12 25 52.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 1 5 6 16.7% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% — — — — — — — —
26 2007 2 8 10 20.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2008 5 11 16 31.3% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2009 6 10 16 37.5% 17 10 27 63.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
29 2010 13 11 24 54.2% 23 12 35 65.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 17 14 31 54.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 0 3 3 0.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 0 6 6 0.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 38 86 124 30.6% 213 186 399 53.4% 6 13 19 31.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — 42 67 109 38.5% 135 98 233 57.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 529/544 of Albert Montanes's and 353/359 of Jose Acasuso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Montanes Jose Acasuso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 18/20 5.4 2.1 47.2% 71.2% 48.0% 59.4% 40.6% 58.6% 34.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 36/38 3.8 3.3 54.9% 71.4% 51.6% 57.5% 46.7% 62.1% 37.5%
20 2001 16/20 4.3 3.1 59.8% 70.4% 56.0% 67.3% 47.4% 64.6% 43.8% 2003 29/30 4.8 3.1 56.4% 68.6% 50.8% 55.4% 40.1% 60.7% 34.0%
21 2002 38/41 3.6 2.9 62.0% 69.0% 49.1% 67.8% 40.7% 61.4% 34.4% 2004 34/34 4.6 2.7 53.8% 72.2% 50.2% 46.7% 37.0% 62.1% 38.3%
22 2003 25/26 4.1 3.4 60.1% 70.8% 48.2% 59.0% 45.5% 61.3% 37.3% 2005 52/53 7.6 2.6 54.1% 75.1% 53.0% 61.8% 40.6% 64.9% 36.3%
23 2004 28/28 2.5 2.5 63.3% 62.9% 45.8% 50.3% 45.0% 56.7% 34.4% 2006 48/48 6.8 2.0 53.0% 74.9% 54.9% 60.2% 46.5% 65.5% 38.8%
24 2005 29/29 4.2 2.5 62.1% 65.9% 50.2% 52.3% 39.3% 59.9% 35.6% 2007 37/37 4.6 2.6 54.8% 71.9% 49.8% 51.2% 42.5% 62.3% 38.6%
25 2006 29/29 3.2 3.6 57.7% 67.3% 47.9% 48.2% 43.8% 58.5% 37.9% 2008 50/50 4.5 3.2 54.9% 72.1% 47.9% 57.8% 36.6% 61.0% 38.0%
26 2007 44/48 3.2 3.3 60.3% 69.4% 48.9% 56.0% 38.4% 61.2% 34.9% 2009 42/42 5.1 2.5 55.4% 72.8% 50.5% 61.1% 39.9% 62.8% 34.6%
27 2008 47/47 3.1 3.7 58.4% 72.3% 50.9% 55.6% 37.3% 63.5% 37.2% 2010 4/4 6.5 2.8 60.8% 73.5% 55.2% 52.3% 47.9% 65.9% 38.2%
28 2009 45/46 3.3 3.0 58.1% 71.4% 50.0% 58.2% 47.4% 62.3% 38.6% 2011 3/3 2.3 0.7 55.7% 70.0% 59.0% 75.9% 43.9% 64.7% 37.4%
29 2010 61/62 4.0 2.5 61.6% 71.4% 52.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 46/47 3.5 4.0 58.3% 69.4% 48.4% 58.1% 41.5% 60.7% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 23/23 1.7 3.4 61.5% 60.0% 47.8% 46.7% 47.8% 55.3% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 37/37 3.9 3.4 61.3% 67.1% 51.2% 60.5% 40.5% 61.0% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 29/29 1.9 3.0 62.6% 68.1% 48.9% 60.0% 45.5% 60.8% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 15/15 2.6 3.7 57.9% 68.3% 46.1% 55.1% 31.5% 58.6% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 15/15 3.3 3.0 59.4% 73.7% 53.9% 41.5% 43.4% 65.3% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 2/2 1.5 2.0 53.4% 64.2% 37.7% 59.9% 45.5% 51.8% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 529/544 3.3 3.2 60.3% 68.9% 49.7% 56.7% 42.5% 61.1% 36.8% — 353/359 5.4 2.7 54.3% 72.6% 51.1% 57.3% 41.3% 62.7% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Montanes Jose Acasuso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1518 102.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1537 125.9 -1.22 -2.64 0.825 46.8% -26 +67 — 42.0% -0.64 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.0 -0.39
19 2000 1499 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1667 134.9 -0.20 -0.36 0.990 49.8% -189 +134 — 52.8% +0.12 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 103.5 +1.97
20 2001 1678 136.6 +1.82 +3.16 1.237 54.2% — +40 — 57.7% +0.83 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.7 -0.51 2003 1614 125.8 -0.09 -3.06 0.865 47.6% -127 +114 — 38.0% -0.53 5–5 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.5 -0.45
21 2002 1605 126.3 -0.60 -2.91 0.890 48.2% -122 +86 — 40.8% -0.64 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 99.3 +0.28 2004 1686 136.4 +0.65 -0.32 1.010 50.2% -228 +141 — 52.6% -0.08 4–4 (50%) 9–3 (75%) 103.8 -0.74
22 2003 1553 119.1 -1.19 -1.31 0.966 49.1% -72 +70 — 43.8% -0.41 2–6 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.10 2005 1725 137.2 +2.49 -0.53 1.034 50.4% -82 +16 — 48.8% -0.07 7–8 (47%) 12–10 (55%) 102.3 +0.52
23 2004 1531 123.5 -3.68 -2.67 0.795 45.5% -81 +112 — 35.8% -1.18 6–1 (86%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 -0.26 2006 1711 145.1 +2.75 +0.79 1.124 52.1% -91 +141 — 56.3% +0.60 9–8 (53%) 8–12 (40%) 98.7 +2.36
24 2005 1578 129.8 -1.65 -2.07 0.887 47.7% -123 +44 — 39.4% -0.73 3–8 (27%) 6–3 (67%) 97.8 -0.48 2007 1686 138.1 -0.78 +1.04 1.023 50.3% -59 +104 — 52.5% +0.01 1–4 (20%) 7–5 (58%) 98.6 +0.97
25 2006 1558 114.9 -2.47 -0.35 0.913 47.9% -140 +77 — 34.8% -1.07 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 +0.20 2008 1697 140.0 -1.63 +0.93 0.973 49.5% -55 +78 — 50.9% +0.17 8–6 (57%) 5–11 (31%) 98.5 +1.79
26 2007 1657 136.8 -1.46 -1.42 0.898 48.4% -226 +127 — 46.5% -0.51 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 103.0 -0.96 2009 1733 148.1 0.00 -1.51 0.931 48.9% -59 +71 — 53.8% +0.22 5–3 (63%) 6–8 (43%) 101.0 -0.56
27 2008 1726 137.6 +0.23 +0.36 1.018 50.3% -269 +135 — 50.4% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 14–8 (64%) 108.7 -0.51 2010 1668 108.9 -1.74 -1.64 1.122 51.9% — — — 37.5% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.71
28 2009 1800 145.9 -0.16 +1.58 1.023 50.4% -267 +114 -233 51.9% +0.07 7–3 (70%) 13–9 (59%) 106.6 +1.21 2011 1657 116.1 +0.80 +1.94 1.062 50.7% — +93 — 57.1% +1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
29 2010 1866 150.2 +0.88 +1.28 1.064 51.3% -133 +83 -229 54.4% +0.29 13–6 (68%) 12–10 (55%) 107.6 +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2011 1732 142.5 -1.48 +0.19 0.979 49.7% -46 +122 — 48.7% +0.12 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) 98.8 +2.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2012 1634 120.3 -5.00 +0.01 0.814 46.0% -31 +58 — 34.0% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 101.0 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2013 1742 140.9 -1.63 -1.53 0.906 48.5% -191 +144 — 45.1% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 5–3 (63%) 106.9 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2014 1694 140.0 -2.09 -1.88 0.865 47.4% -170 +74 — 45.9% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2015 1697 129.2 -3.02 +0.08 0.916 48.2% — +91 — 48.5% -0.36 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.8 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2016 1637 127.9 +0.93 -1.97 0.987 49.5% — +84 — 47.2% -0.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2017 1613 100.6 -4.34 -0.80 0.755 44.7% — — — 50.0% -1.00 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1916 141.7 -1.13 -0.50 0.946 49.0% -161 +96 -231 46.2% -0.31 84–64 (57%) 90–90 (50%) 106.4 +0.73 — 1830 143.9 +0.39 -0.37 0.991 49.8% -86 +97 — 50.5% +0.05 47–45 (51%) 59–66 (47%) 101.2 +1.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.