H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Albert Montanes vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 2-0
Albert Montanes holds a 2–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Montanes leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Montanes won the 2014 Miami Masters first round 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2015* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Albert Montanes | 6-2 7-6(6) | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2014* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Albert Montanes | 5-7 7-6(5) 6-3 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Albert Montanes | 5-7 1-6 7-5 7-6(5) 6-0 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Albert Montanes | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |