H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Albert Montanes vs Potito Starace H2H: 3-1

Albert Montanes holds a 3–1 lead over Potito Starace in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Albert Montanes leads 3–0 on clay, while Potito Starace leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Potito Starace won the 2012 Auckland third round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Montanes
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Potito Starace
ITA Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 11, 2012* Auckland ATP 250 R32 Hard Potito Starace #56 6-3 6-2 Albert Montanes #50 Match data
Sep 24, 2009* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Albert Montanes #53 6-4 6-2 Potito Starace #91 Match data
Apr 29, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Albert Montanes #33 7-6(8) 6-4 Potito Starace #88 Match data
Sep 29, 2006* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Montanes #82 6-2 6-2 Potito Starace #103 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Montanes #335 #22 1,770 1,920 257 287 47.2% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Potito Starace #943 #27 1,138 1,789 147 188 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Montanes Potito Starace
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2001 12–8 60.0% #65 1,678 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2002 17–24 41.5% #78 1,606 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #222 1,481 0 0
22 2003 10–16 38.5% #81 1,553 0 0 2004 8–9 47.1% #76 1,603 0 0
23 2004 11–17 39.3% #99 1,529 0 0 2005 13–20 39.4% #105 1,588 0 0
24 2005 10–19 34.5% #71 1,578 0 0 2006 13–17 43.3% #83 1,591 0 0
25 2006 11–18 37.9% #85 1,557 0 0 2007 25–25 50.0% #31 1,655 0 0
26 2007 24–24 50.0% #46 1,656 0 0 2008 18–21 46.2% #72 1,650 0 0
27 2008 24–23 51.1% #45 1,726 0 1 2009 15–23 39.5% #62 1,667 0 0
28 2009 25–21 54.3% #31 1,816 0 3 2010 23–25 47.9% #47 1,735 0 0
29 2010 38–24 61.3% #25 1,868 0 5 2011 22–26 45.8% #58 1,704 0 0
30 2011 22–25 46.8% #53 1,731 0 5 2012 8–18 30.8% #164 1,599 0 0
31 2012 7–16 30.4% #96 1,634 0 5 2013 1–1 50.0% #152 1,545 0 0
32 2013 18–19 48.6% #63 1,741 0 6 2014 1–2 33.3% #163 1,636 0 0
33 2014 13–16 44.8% #108 1,693 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2015 7–8 46.7% #116 1,697 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2016 7–8 46.7% #164 1,637 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2017 1–1 50.0% #335 1,612 0 6 — — — — — — —