H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Albert Portas vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 1-1
Albert Portas and Jiri Vanek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Albert Portas won the 2005 Umag third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2005* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Portas | 6-1 6-0 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| May 24, 2001* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jiri Vanek | 6-4 6-1 | Albert Portas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Portas | #1,082 | #19 | 1,350 | 1,826 | 142 | 198 | 41.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Portas | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #392 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #119 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #35 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #84 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #20 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 9–23 | 28.1% | #88 | 1,525 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #85 | 1,523 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,443 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,437 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #140 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2007 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #338 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |