H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-2

Dominic Thiem holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–0 on clay, while Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2019 Austrian Open Kitzbühel final 7-6(0) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #4 7-6(0) 6-1 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #69 Match data Aug 3, 2019* F Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP 250 Clay
Dominic Thiem #8 6-1 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #25 Match data Feb 25, 2017* SF Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #31 6-1 6-4 Dominic Thiem #10 Match data Oct 1, 2016* QF Chengdu Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 +0.05 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 99.4 -0.23 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) 96.4 -0.55 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) 94.2 +0.49 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) 95.2 -1.20 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) 97.7 -1.24 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) 101.8 -2.25 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) 99.4 +3.34 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) 100.6 +2.45 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) 97.2 -1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) 89.7 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) 93.9 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) 97.3 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) 93.6 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.