H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Jack Sock H2H: 1-0
Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 1–0 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2016 Roland Garros third round 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2014 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Jack Sock | 3-6 6-3 7-6(6) | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Jack Sock | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |