H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 3-2

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 3–2 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 3–1 on clay, while Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2021 Dubai second round 6-3 3-6 6-4.

Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 16, 2021* Dubai ATP 500 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #53 6-3 3-6 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #47 Match data
Oct 28, 2019 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Q1 Q Hard Jeremy Chardy #65 6-4 6-4 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #40 Match data
Aug 2, 2019* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Ramos-Vinolas #69 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #74 Match data
May 7, 2019* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Jeremy Chardy #47 6-2 4-6 7-5 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #85 Match data
May 3, 2016* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Albert Ramos-Vinolas #56 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #33 Match data
Apr 14, 2012* Casablanca ATP 250 QF Clay Albert Ramos-Vinolas #52 6-3 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,966 276 327 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,732 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,647 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,725 0 0 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2016 34–30 53.1% #27 1,886 0 1 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,813 0 1 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,660 0 4
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,570 0 4 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,570 0 4