H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Joao Sousa H2H: 6-2

Albert Ramos-Vinolas holds a 6–2 lead over Joao Sousa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 4–1 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2023 Cordoba quarterfinal 6-4 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Albert Ramos-Vinolas
Spain Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Joao Sousa
POR Age 37 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #54 6-4 2-6 6-1 Joao Sousa #162 Match data Feb 11, 2023* QF Cordoba ATP 250 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #91 6-0 6-3 Joao Sousa #70 Match data May 23, 2019* R16 Geneva Open ATP 250 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #25 3-6 6-3 7-5 Joao Sousa #63 Match data Oct 10, 2017* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #24 6-7(5) 7-5 6-2 Joao Sousa #37 Match data Mar 4, 2017* SF Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Joao Sousa #44 6-1 7-5 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #26 Match data Jan 11, 2017* R32 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #67 6-2 6-2 Joao Sousa #53 Match data Mar 27, 2015* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Joao Sousa #48 7-6(6) 2-6 6-3 Albert Ramos-Vinolas #87 Match data Feb 21, 2014* R16 Rio Open ATP 500 Clay
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #42 6-2 6-3 Joao Sousa #140 Match data May 5, 2012* QF Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Albert Ramos-Vinolas #477 #17 2,180 1,967 276 328 45.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Joao Sousa #954 #28 1,355 1,916 190 250 43.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Joao Sousa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #592 1,550 0 0
22 2010 2–4 33.3% #123 1,554 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #192 1,507 0 0
23 2011 13–16 44.8% #66 1,722 0 0 2012 3–4 42.9% #101 1,587 0 0
24 2012 26–30 46.4% #50 1,729 0 0 2013 14–13 51.9% #49 1,797 0 1
25 2013 19–22 46.3% #83 1,646 0 0 2014 23–34 40.4% #54 1,738 0 1
26 2014 13–20 39.4% #63 1,726 0 0 2015 34–30 53.1% #33 1,904 0 2
27 2015 16–23 41.0% #54 1,768 0 0 2016 25–33 43.1% #43 1,805 0 2
28 2016 34–31 52.3% #27 1,884 0 1 2017 22–30 42.3% #57 1,735 0 2
29 2017 33–30 52.4% #23 1,814 0 1 2018 25–26 49.0% #44 1,782 0 3
30 2018 18–28 39.1% #65 1,700 0 1 2019 25–28 47.2% #60 1,757 0 3
31 2019 30–24 55.6% #41 1,854 0 2 2020 0–9 0.0% #90 1,607 0 3
32 2020 9–14 39.1% #46 1,704 0 2 2021 1–13 7.1% #140 1,534 0 3
33 2021 24–25 49.0% #45 1,730 0 3 2022 13–20 39.4% #82 1,565 0 4
34 2022 24–27 47.1% #39 1,741 0 4 2023 3–7 30.0% #249 1,510 0 4
35 2023 12–23 34.3% #89 1,644 0 4 2024 0–1 0.0% #726 1,503 0 4
36 2024 3–9 25.0% #165 1,563 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2025 0–2 0.0% #403 1,565 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Joao Sousa
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2011 2 6 8 25.0% 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2012 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
24 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 12 9 21 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
25 2013 4 8 12 33.3% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 12 18 30 40.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 2015 18 17 35 51.4% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2016 12 20 32 37.5% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2016 13 16 29 44.8% 19 13 32 59.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2017 10 14 24 41.7% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2017 9 15 24 37.5% 22 13 35 62.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2018 15 17 32 46.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2018 5 13 18 27.8% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 11 12 23 47.8% 10 12 22 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
32 2020 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 2021 1 3 4 25.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 19 11 30 63.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2022 6 9 15 40.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 19 14 33 57.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
35 2023 1 7 8 12.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 72 135 207 34.8% 198 174 372 53.2% 6 19 25 24.0% — 97 127 224 43.3% 79 98 177 44.6% 14 25 39 35.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 602/604 of Albert Ramos-Vinolas's and 436/440 of Joao Sousa's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Joao Sousa
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 3.5 1.5 58.6% 67.3% 65.4% 70.8% 31.3% 66.6% 39.5%
22 2010 6/6 2.5 1.8 66.2% 60.9% 51.8% 60.4% 46.9% 57.6% 36.1% 2011 2/2 3.0 1.0 60.3% 61.5% 41.4% 29.8% 58.3% 53.5% 34.6%
23 2011 29/29 3.9 3.0 60.1% 69.1% 50.5% 63.4% 38.7% 61.6% 37.0% 2012 7/7 2.1 3.1 59.5% 66.3% 47.7% 45.8% 29.7% 59.0% 40.6%
24 2012 55/56 3.2 3.3 59.1% 66.7% 51.5% 59.4% 43.4% 60.6% 38.7% 2013 27/27 2.9 2.3 61.8% 68.0% 46.5% 57.4% 38.5% 59.6% 36.1%
25 2013 41/41 3.4 2.4 61.5% 69.1% 53.3% 51.7% 44.1% 62.9% 37.6% 2014 56/57 2.7 2.1 60.3% 67.6% 48.1% 61.1% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
26 2014 33/33 2.3 2.0 64.4% 65.9% 50.1% 52.1% 47.9% 60.1% 37.3% 2015 64/64 3.0 2.1 59.2% 70.2% 51.9% 61.3% 42.7% 62.8% 37.0%
27 2015 39/39 3.6 2.2 62.9% 68.7% 53.8% 64.3% 41.5% 63.2% 35.8% 2016 56/58 3.4 2.2 63.4% 69.2% 47.7% 50.2% 42.9% 61.2% 36.5%
28 2016 64/65 3.7 2.8 62.8% 68.4% 51.1% 59.0% 48.8% 61.9% 37.7% 2017 52/52 4.5 2.8 58.5% 72.3% 49.8% 56.2% 38.4% 62.7% 36.5%
29 2017 63/63 4.5 2.6 61.4% 67.8% 52.8% 58.9% 39.0% 62.0% 37.9% 2018 51/51 4.2 2.4 60.3% 72.2% 49.4% 49.3% 35.8% 63.1% 37.5%
30 2018 46/46 3.9 2.8 60.6% 69.6% 48.7% 59.4% 32.8% 61.3% 33.7% 2019 53/53 5.1 1.8 61.7% 70.5% 49.4% 55.1% 38.5% 62.3% 34.5%
31 2019 54/54 2.9 1.8 63.4% 69.5% 54.3% 61.2% 45.2% 63.8% 37.8% 2020 9/9 4.3 2.9 57.1% 63.3% 48.5% 51.5% 35.3% 56.6% 31.7%
32 2020 23/23 2.3 2.7 61.6% 64.6% 53.3% 58.9% 39.7% 60.5% 36.9% 2021 13/14 2.7 2.2 59.1% 63.1% 44.6% 47.1% 31.2% 54.6% 33.4%
33 2021 49/49 2.9 2.4 62.6% 68.5% 51.5% 53.8% 42.1% 62.1% 39.0% 2022 33/33 3.6 2.4 62.3% 67.9% 49.2% 54.1% 34.8% 60.9% 37.2%
34 2022 51/51 2.5 1.8 64.9% 66.5% 51.5% 56.6% 42.9% 61.2% 37.8% 2023 10/10 2.1 2.0 59.4% 62.8% 43.7% 49.1% 35.6% 55.3% 31.3%
35 2023 35/35 2.9 2.0 65.2% 65.2% 50.1% 64.4% 42.5% 60.1% 37.2% 2024 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.3% 64.4% 51.4% 50.0% 25.0% 58.8% 34.7%
36 2024 12/12 1.0 1.8 61.5% 59.6% 44.2% 50.8% 37.1% 53.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 2/2 2.0 2.5 64.5% 61.5% 52.5% 56.0% 37.5% 58.0% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 602/604 3.3 2.4 62.4% 67.6% 51.6% 58.5% 42.4% 61.5% 37.3% — 436/440 3.6 2.2 60.6% 69.3% 48.9% 55.0% 38.5% 61.2% 36.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Albert Ramos-Vinolas Joao Sousa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1487 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1551 109.7 -0.19 -0.49 1.182 54.2% — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.24
20 2008 1480 92.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1550 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1471 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1543 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2010 1554 112.8 -2.03 -1.22 0.853 47.4% — +71 — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 2011 1507 100.3 -2.74 +2.42 0.742 44.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
23 2011 1723 132.7 -0.88 -0.32 0.962 49.3% -126 +59 — 43.7% -0.32 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.23 2012 1587 111.9 -2.10 -0.18 0.991 49.4% — +54 — 41.2% -0.77 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.38
24 2012 1729 149.2 -1.59 +1.54 0.983 49.6% -70 +70 — 45.2% -0.28 4–7 (36%) 12–18 (40%) — -0.55 2013 1797 138.5 -2.50 -0.67 0.896 48.2% -3 -191 — 47.9% -0.34 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.54
25 2013 1646 141.1 -0.38 +0.44 1.014 50.1% -91 +168 -87 48.5% -0.15 5–10 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.49 2014 1738 146.5 -2.75 -1.03 0.869 47.5% +1 -106 -36 39.7% -0.87 12–10 (55%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.16
26 2014 1727 143.5 -2.00 +0.37 0.934 48.8% -165 +124 — 38.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 1–11 (8%) — -1.20 2015 1904 152.2 -1.01 +1.38 0.995 49.9% -46 -72 -203 50.0% 0.00 15–9 (63%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.31
27 2015 1768 152.4 -0.04 +0.07 0.974 49.5% -88 +32 -159 43.6% -0.40 3–10 (23%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.24 2016 1806 151.2 -1.66 +0.21 0.941 48.8% +1 +17 -112 44.7% -0.45 9–13 (41%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.35
28 2016 1884 158.2 -1.18 +1.68 0.990 49.9% -90 +94 -207 48.8% +0.06 14–8 (64%) 8–16 (33%) — -2.25 2017 1736 145.9 -0.81 -0.18 0.979 49.7% +18 +58 -117 46.3% -0.23 7–14 (33%) 8–12 (40%) — +2.40
29 2017 1814 155.6 -0.89 +1.55 0.996 50.0% -85 +157 -119 50.0% +0.10 18–14 (56%) 14–18 (44%) — +3.34 2018 1783 147.5 -0.33 +1.07 1.015 50.0% +38 -32 -147 46.7% -0.07 14–11 (56%) 12–10 (55%) — +1.17
30 2018 1700 139.0 -1.71 -1.37 0.872 47.7% -16 +112 — 42.0% -0.71 9–10 (47%) 11–7 (61%) — +2.45 2019 1758 141.2 -1.27 -1.02 0.916 48.4% +5 -7 -4 45.8% -0.41 13–10 (57%) 11–13 (46%) — -0.09
31 2019 1855 153.7 +0.41 +1.33 1.046 50.9% -114 +113 — 53.2% +0.32 7–6 (54%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.29 2020 1608 110.6 -2.88 -2.72 0.729 44.1% +41 +32 — 8.7% -2.35 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.04
32 2020 1704 132.0 -1.84 -0.55 0.934 48.9% -30 +113 — 43.3% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 4–11 (27%) — +0.07 2021 1534 111.8 -5.26 -2.49 0.736 44.3% +92 +15 — 17.1% -2.14 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.37
33 2021 1731 142.2 -0.29 +1.34 1.029 50.4% -66 +87 -159 48.1% -0.02 13–12 (52%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.43 2022 1565 131.7 -1.95 -0.02 0.952 48.8% +14 +70 +27 40.2% -0.41 6–6 (50%) 6–12 (33%) — +0.40
34 2022 1742 139.7 -1.81 +1.14 0.973 49.3% -91 +77 — 47.2% -0.26 8–10 (44%) 10–12 (45%) — +1.15 2023 1510 117.4 -3.91 -3.09 0.700 43.9% — +62 — 32.0% -1.80 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.20
35 2023 1645 131.6 -2.86 -0.15 0.933 48.8% -74 +108 — 37.9% -0.32 9–10 (47%) 3–11 (21%) — +1.27 2024 1504 100.9 +0.27 +1.28 0.840 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.10
36 2024 1564 117.8 -4.99 -1.79 0.749 44.7% — +77 — 21.4% -1.93 2–0 0–4 (0%) — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2025 1566 115.1 +0.20 +0.65 0.750 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — — — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 149.2 -1.17 +0.67 0.970 49.4% -82 +102 -148 45.5% -0.21 107–114 (48%) 96–157 (38%) 90.1 +0.20 — 1917 144.3 -1.66 -0.16 0.928 48.6% +4 -9 -83 43.2% -0.48 86–82 (51%) 77–93 (45%) 99.0 +1.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.