H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2013 St. Petersburg third round 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |