H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Mikael Ymer H2H: 0-1
Mikael Ymer holds a 1–0 lead over Albert Ramos-Vinolas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mikael Ymer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikael Ymer won the 2021 Winston-Salem third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2021* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mikael Ymer | 6-3 6-1 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| Jul 7, 2014 | Bastad | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-1 6-0 | Mikael Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mikael Ymer | #626 | #50 | 981 | 1,861 | 58 | 74 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Mikael Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #596 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #497 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #417 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #255 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #94 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #94 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #136 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |