H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Milos Raonic H2H: 1-1
Albert Ramos-Vinolas and Milos Raonic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on clay, while Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2017 Wimbledon third round 7-6(3) 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Milos Raonic | 7-6(3) 6-4 7-5 | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
| May 31, 2016* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Milos Raonic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |