H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:15 UTC
Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Zhizhen Zhang
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Albert Ramos-Vinolas vs Zhizhen Zhang.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Zhizhen Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |