H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Alberto Berasategui vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–2 lead over Alberto Berasategui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Monte-Carlo Masters semifinal 6-3 0-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alberto Berasategui
ESP Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #16 6-3 0-6 7-6(5) Alberto Berasategui #14 Match data Apr 26, 1998* SF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Cedric Pioline #19 4-6 6-1 6-4 6-0 Alberto Berasategui #35 Match data Jun 2, 1996* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Alberto Berasategui #8 6-2 6-2 Cedric Pioline #52 Match data Apr 27, 1995* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Alberto Berasategui #23 6-4 7-5 6-3 Cedric Pioline #14 Match data May 27, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Cedric Pioline #12 6-3 4-6 6-2 Alberto Berasategui #34 Match data Feb 11, 1994* R16 Milan ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alberto Berasategui #1,019 #7 2,532 1,984 276 195 58.6% 0 0 0 1 13 14
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alberto Berasategui Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 8–11 42.1% #115 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 28–19 59.6% #36 1,734 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1994 64–26 71.1% #8 1,910 0 8 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1995 35–27 56.5% #32 1,760 0 9 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1996 46–26 63.9% #19 1,810 0 12 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,848 0 0
24 1997 39–27 59.1% #23 1,733 0 13 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1998 32–24 57.1% #21 1,650 0 14 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1999 20–20 50.0% #61 1,739 0 14 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 2000 4–14 22.2% #153 1,563 0 14 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 2001 0–1 0.0% #737 1,550 0 14 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alberto Berasategui Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1992 3 4 7 42.9% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 27 17 44 61.4% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 1 3 4 25.0% 62 15 77 80.5% — — — — 1 8 9 11.1% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1995 7 5 12 58.3% 26 18 44 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1996 6 5 11 54.5% 37 17 54 68.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 32 15 47 68.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1998 7 9 16 43.8% 25 15 40 62.5% — — — — — — — — 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 20 15 35 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 2000 1 5 6 16.7% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 32 47 79 40.5% 237 128 365 64.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 18 25 28.0% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 406/471 of Alberto Berasategui's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alberto Berasategui Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1992 17/19 0.9 2.4 70.8% 59.4% 48.8% 50.6% 37.5% 55.9% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 36/47 1.2 2.3 69.7% 66.0% 50.9% 61.9% 49.9% 61.2% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1994 78/90 1.6 2.3 72.1% 64.5% 51.4% 56.8% 48.3% 60.7% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1995 57/62 1.7 2.4 74.3% 63.2% 50.8% 59.0% 48.5% 59.9% 40.7% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1996 65/72 1.7 2.2 73.5% 64.6% 51.7% 60.0% 45.7% 61.2% 43.2% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1997 62/66 2.5 2.7 73.5% 65.0% 50.1% 52.7% 42.9% 60.9% 42.4% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1998 46/56 1.9 4.0 72.9% 64.8% 49.3% 49.2% 47.3% 60.3% 40.9% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 1999 28/40 1.2 4.5 75.9% 61.4% 43.1% 52.8% 46.7% 57.0% 41.5% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 2000 16/18 0.4 4.6 72.8% 57.4% 34.5% 48.3% 32.3% 51.2% 38.7% 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 2001 1/1 0.0 5.0 74.7% 61.3% 33.3% 40.0% 40.0% 54.2% 45.9% 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 406/471 1.7 2.8 73.0% 63.9% 49.5% 55.7% 45.9% 59.8% 42.7% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alberto Berasategui Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1992 1545 115.2 -2.33 +0.25 0.945 48.9% -13 +24 — 42.2% -0.64 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.8 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1735 139.6 +0.99 +3.32 1.144 52.9% -210 +66 — 56.1% +0.63 9–10 (47%) 1–5 (17%) 99.7 +2.43 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1994 1910 155.3 +0.92 +5.64 1.158 53.0% -419 +179 — 67.0% +0.96 18–13 (58%) 14–11 (56%) 100.3 -1.12 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1995 1760 140.8 -0.66 +1.17 1.015 50.4% -125 +95 — 53.6% +0.31 15–8 (65%) 12–12 (50%) 104.0 +2.27 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1996 1811 147.3 -0.04 +3.86 1.113 52.1% -103 +79 — 59.4% +0.59 12–7 (63%) 11–12 (48%) 101.3 +0.31 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 1997 1733 142.4 -0.21 +3.09 1.084 51.5% -144 +177 — 59.3% +0.47 10–8 (56%) 10–7 (59%) 98.2 +1.92 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 1998 1651 147.7 -0.75 +2.56 1.028 50.5% -5 +112 — 55.6% +0.37 9–5 (64%) 11–11 (50%) 104.8 -0.34 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 1999 1739 131.6 -2.95 +2.41 0.964 49.4% -156 +56 — 50.5% -0.01 9–8 (53%) 8–6 (57%) 102.7 -1.61 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 2000 1563 108.6 -5.92 -0.37 0.793 45.0% -61 +108 — 25.6% -1.79 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.3 +0.01 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 2001 1551 100.9 -2.76 -0.20 1.002 49.5% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.02 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1984 147.2 -0.49 +3.08 1.062 51.2% -136 +114 — 56.4% +0.39 86–65 (57%) 71–70 (50%) 102.3 +0.95 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.