H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Alberto Berasategui vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–2 lead over Alberto Berasategui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters semifinal 6-3 0-6 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alberto Berasategui
ESP Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 26, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Cedric Pioline #16 6-3 0-6 7-6(5) Alberto Berasategui #14 Match data
Jun 2, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Cedric Pioline #19 4-6 6-1 6-4 6-0 Alberto Berasategui #35 Match data
Apr 27, 1995* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Alberto Berasategui #8 6-2 6-2 Cedric Pioline #52 Match data
May 27, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Alberto Berasategui #23 6-4 7-5 6-3 Cedric Pioline #14 Match data
Feb 11, 1994* Milan ATP 250 R16 Carpet Cedric Pioline #12 6-3 4-6 6-2 Alberto Berasategui #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alberto Berasategui #1,019 #7 2,532 1,982 276 195 58.6% 0 0 0 0 14 14
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alberto Berasategui Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1992 8–11 42.1% #115 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 28–19 59.6% #36 1,740 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1994 64–26 71.1% #8 1,908 0 8 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1995 35–27 56.5% #32 1,761 0 9 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1996 46–26 63.9% #19 1,809 0 12 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1997 39–27 59.1% #23 1,733 0 13 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1998 32–24 57.1% #21 1,649 0 14 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1999 20–20 50.0% #61 1,739 0 14 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2000 4–14 22.2% #153 1,563 0 14 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2001 0–1 0.0% #737 1,551 0 14 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5