H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alberto Berasategui vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 2-1
Alberto Berasategui holds a 2–1 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Alberto Berasategui leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 1998 Roland Garros fourth round 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1998* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Alberto Berasategui | 6-3 7-6(3) | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1996* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alberto Berasategui | 6-1 6-3 | Hicham Arazi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Berasategui | #1,019 | #7 | 2,532 | 1,982 | 276 | 195 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Berasategui | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #23 | 1,733 | 0 | 13 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,649 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #737 | 1,551 | 0 | 14 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |