H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Alberto Berasategui vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 0-1
Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Alberto Berasategui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1998 Mexico City third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1998* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Leonardo Lavalle | 6-3 7-6(3) | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Berasategui | #1,019 | #7 | 2,532 | 1,982 | 276 | 195 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Berasategui | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #23 | 1,733 | 0 | 13 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,649 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 14 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #737 | 1,551 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |