H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alberto Berasategui vs Paolo Cane H2H: 2-1
Alberto Berasategui holds a 2–1 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alberto Berasategui leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Alberto Berasategui won the 1994 Palermo third round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1994* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alberto Berasategui | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1994* | Umag | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alberto Berasategui | 6-2 6-2 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1994* | Florence | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-3 (ret.) | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Berasategui | #1,019 | #7 | 2,532 | 1,982 | 276 | 195 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Berasategui | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1995 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #23 | 1,733 | 0 | 13 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,649 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 14 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 14 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #737 | 1,551 | 0 | 14 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |