H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alberto Berasategui vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 1-2
Richard Krajicek holds a 2–1 lead over Alberto Berasategui in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Berasategui won the 1996 Paris Masters third round 3-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1996* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Alberto Berasategui | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Feb 29, 1996* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 6-0 | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1993* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Berasategui | #1,019 | #7 | 2,532 | 1,982 | 276 | 195 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Berasategui | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1994 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1995 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #23 | 1,733 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1998 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,649 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1999 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #737 | 1,551 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |