H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Alberto Berasategui vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 1-1
Alberto Berasategui and Todd Woodbridge are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alberto Berasategui leads 1–0 on clay, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Berasategui won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1998* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Alberto Berasategui | 6-0 7-5 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1996* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Todd Woodbridge | 7-5 6-1 | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Berasategui | #1,019 | #7 | 2,532 | 1,982 | 276 | 195 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Berasategui | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #23 | 1,733 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,649 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 14 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #737 | 1,551 | 0 | 14 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |