H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Alberto Martin vs Ivan Navarro H2H: 0-1
Ivan Navarro holds a 1–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Navarro won the 2009 Estoril third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2009* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Navarro | 7-5 6-4 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2008 | Sydney | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Alberto Martin | 6-3 7-6(5) | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ivan Navarro | #1,929 | #67 | 1,108 | 1,627 | 35 | 65 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Martin | Ivan Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #128 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #124 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #74 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #193 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |