H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alberto Martin vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 3-0
Alberto Martin holds a 3–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alberto Martin leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Alberto Martin won the 2006 Costa Do Sauipe quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2006* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Alberto Martin | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2005* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 6-0 2-6 7-6(1) | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 6-3 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Martin | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |