H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Alberto Martin vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 0-1
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo holds a 1–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2006 Amersfoort quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2009 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Alberto Martin | 6-1 6-3 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2006* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-2 6-2 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alberto Martin | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |