H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 27
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | #20 | #14 | 2,635 | 1,974 | 177 | 153 | 53.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #52 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #50 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 44–26 | 62.9% | #14 | 1,898 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #20 | 1,882 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |