H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Alejandro Falla vs Daniel Brands H2H: 0-1

Daniel Brands holds a 1–0 lead over Alejandro Falla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Brands leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Brands won the 2013 Shanghai Masters first round 7-6(3) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alejandro Falla
COL Age 42 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Brands #60 7-6(3) 7-5 Alejandro Falla #110 Match data Oct 9, 2013* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Daniel Brands #129 4-6 7-5 6-1 Alejandro Falla #171 Match data May 25, 2009 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alejandro Falla #646 #50 869 1,813 97 159 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alejandro Falla Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2004 5–7 41.7% #127 1,596 0 0 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2005 0–2 0.0% #231 1,533 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2006 4–8 33.3% #108 1,618 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2007 12–16 42.9% #81 1,739 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2008 6–11 35.3% #180 1,603 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2009 2–8 20.0% #81 1,744 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2010 14–19 42.4% #105 1,685 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2011 9–14 39.1% #74 1,714 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2012 14–24 36.8% #54 1,758 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2013 13–20 39.4% #99 1,706 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2014 9–17 34.6% #88 1,625 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2015 7–11 38.9% #122 1,713 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2016 1–1 50.0% #273 1,558 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2017 1–1 50.0% #397 1,579 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alejandro Falla Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2006 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
23 2007 6 9 15 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2008 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
25 2009 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2010 9 12 21 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2012 10 16 26 38.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2013 12 15 27 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2014 4 11 15 26.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2015 4 5 9 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2016 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 60 99 159 37.7% 18 33 51 35.3% 16 25 41 39.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 255/256 of Alejandro Falla's and 151/151 of Daniel Brands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alejandro Falla Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 2004 12/12 2.3 2.2 62.1% 64.1% 48.0% 54.5% 47.8% 58.0% 38.7% 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2005 2/2 7.0 4.0 58.8% 60.6% 35.2% 60.6% 33.3% 50.3% 27.2% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2006 12/12 3.3 1.6 60.9% 63.2% 48.3% 48.2% 29.4% 57.4% 36.4% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2007 28/28 3.2 1.1 61.7% 68.4% 52.3% 57.6% 47.8% 62.3% 38.1% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2008 17/17 4.3 3.2 57.3% 64.9% 49.0% 60.1% 35.7% 57.8% 37.4% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2009 10/10 3.4 4.6 58.6% 67.1% 43.0% 53.8% 54.7% 57.3% 34.1% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2010 33/33 3.0 2.9 57.8% 67.9% 48.2% 57.8% 40.1% 59.9% 36.5% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2011 23/23 3.0 2.7 57.2% 65.3% 52.3% 59.9% 41.0% 59.5% 37.7% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2012 37/38 2.8 2.2 60.2% 64.7% 49.2% 49.5% 42.4% 58.3% 36.6% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2013 33/33 3.9 2.7 56.7% 66.5% 50.0% 49.3% 46.7% 59.3% 37.6% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2014 26/26 4.0 4.1 56.8% 67.3% 42.8% 55.8% 44.1% 56.7% 35.3% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2015 18/18 3.2 3.6 59.1% 65.9% 47.8% 50.1% 40.6% 58.5% 35.4% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2016 2/2 3.5 0.0 64.7% 68.8% 45.4% 41.7% 43.2% 60.5% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 2/2 1.0 2.0 59.1% 62.5% 46.4% 60.6% 39.2% 56.2% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 255/256 3.3 2.7 58.8% 66.1% 48.5% 54.2% 42.8% 58.8% 36.8% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alejandro Falla Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2004 1596 116.1 -2.01 +1.05 0.920 48.5% -80 +3 — 42.4% -0.70 1–1 0–2 — -0.39 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2005 1533 100.3 +0.13 -3.88 0.547 39.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.07 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2006 1618 117.2 -2.23 +0.32 0.854 47.0% -97 — — 41.7% -0.81 0–3 (0%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.07 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2007 1739 130.3 -0.70 +1.59 1.011 49.8% +12 -206 +9 45.6% -0.16 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.31 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2008 1604 108.1 -4.51 +0.56 0.887 47.7% +30 — +46 40.4% -0.75 4–4 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — +1.15 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2009 1745 123.9 -2.23 +0.61 0.798 46.6% -8 — — 26.9% -1.38 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.93 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2010 1686 137.5 -2.11 +0.72 0.909 48.1% -23 -123 +56 45.7% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 6–5 (55%) — -2.52 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2011 1715 126.9 -2.09 +0.31 0.931 48.7% -49 +44 — 39.0% -0.80 1–3 (25%) 2–7 (22%) — +0.08 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2012 1758 138.6 -3.85 +1.15 0.877 47.5% -36 -85 +17 38.5% -0.72 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) — -1.79 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2013 1707 140.6 -3.57 +0.56 0.924 48.4% +44 -96 — 42.3% -0.40 3–5 (38%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.51 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2014 1626 134.3 -5.48 -0.41 0.815 46.5% +23 -36 +137 37.7% -0.66 3–2 (60%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.30 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2015 1713 132.3 -4.26 -0.04 0.852 47.2% -12 -80 +103 39.1% -0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) — +1.04 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2016 1558 101.5 -0.45 -1.30 1.061 50.4% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2017 1580 107.9 -0.79 -1.57 0.935 48.8% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1813 133.6 -3.01 +0.56 0.894 47.9% -7 -64 +67 40.6% -0.65 27–41 (40%) 47–58 (45%) 95.1 -0.95 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.