H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Alejandro Falla vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 1-0
Alejandro Falla holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alejandro Falla leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alejandro Falla won the 2010 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 42
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alejandro Falla | 7-5 6-3 6-1 | Marcos Daniel | Match data |
| May 23, 2005 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Marcos Daniel | 1-6 6-1 6-1 | Alejandro Falla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Falla | #646 | #50 | 869 | 1,813 | 97 | 158 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marcos Daniel | #904 | #56 | 942 | 1,649 | 20 | 63 | 24.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alejandro Falla | Marcos Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #180 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #81 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #105 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #94 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #74 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #165 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #54 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #99 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #87 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2014 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #88 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2015 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #122 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #273 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #904 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #397 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |