H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:32 UTC
Alejandro Tabilo vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 1-1
Alejandro Tabilo and Dusan Lajovic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dusan Lajovic leads 1–0 on clay, while Alejandro Tabilo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alejandro Tabilo won the 2025 BNP Paribas Open second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 29
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2025* | BNP Paribas Open | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Alejandro Tabilo | 6-3 7-5 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2024* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Dusan Lajovic | 6-4 1-6 6-1 | Alejandro Tabilo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Tabilo | #31 | #19 | 2,043 | 1,880 | 84 | 77 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alejandro Tabilo | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #169 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #100 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,782 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |