H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alessandro Giannessi vs Rogerio Dutra Silva H2H: 3-0
Alessandro Giannessi holds a 3–0 lead over Rogerio Dutra Silva in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alessandro Giannessi leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Alessandro Giannessi won the 2017 Umag quarterfinal 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 36
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2017* | Umag | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Alessandro Giannessi | 6-7(3) 6-2 7-5 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2017* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alessandro Giannessi | 6-4 6-3 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2017* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alessandro Giannessi | 5-7 7-6(6) 6-4 | Rogerio Dutra Silva | Match data |
| May 19, 2013 | Nice | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Rogerio Dutra Silva | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Alessandro Giannessi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alessandro Giannessi | #1,488 | #84 | 610 | 1,639 | 12 | 22 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rogerio Dutra Silva | #735 | #63 | 733 | 1,745 | 23 | 59 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alessandro Giannessi | Rogerio Dutra Silva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #135 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #260 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #128 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #158 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #154 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #126 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #262 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #101 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #159 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #236 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |