H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Alex Calatrava vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 1-0
Alex Calatrava holds a 1–0 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Calatrava leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Calatrava won the 1999 Casablanca third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 1999* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Calatrava | 7-5 6-3 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Calatrava | Marcelo Filippini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |