H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Alex Calatrava vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 0-1
Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Calatrava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo won the 2004 Valencia third round 6-7(7) 7-6(1) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2004* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | 6-7(7) 7-6(1) 6-4 | Alex Calatrava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Calatrava | #1,017 | #44 | 841 | 1,719 | 69 | 109 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Calatrava | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #250 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #114 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2000 | 20–10 | 66.7% | #56 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2001 | 18–29 | 38.3% | #100 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #133 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2004 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #81 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2005 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #202 | 1,469 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #180 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |