H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Alberto Martin H2H: 3-0
Alex Corretja holds a 3–0 lead over Alberto Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-3 6-4 6-4 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1999* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-1 6-2 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1998* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-1 6-0 | Alberto Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Alberto Martin | #1,023 | #34 | 1,008 | 1,799 | 218 | 267 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Alberto Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #226 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #111 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #105 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #57 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #79 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #54 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #68 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 2005 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2006 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2007 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #143 | 1,623 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2009 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #128 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 2010 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #243 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |