H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-1

Alex Corretja holds a 4–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 3–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2000 Sydney third round 6-4 6-4.

ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 2000* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Alex Corretja #28 6-4 6-4 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data
Jun 7, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Alex Corretja #14 6-3 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Jan 25, 1998* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #21 6-2 6-1 6-4 Alex Corretja #13 Match data
Jul 11, 1997* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Alex Corretja #6 6-2 3-2 (ret.) Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Apr 24, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Alex Corretja #18 6-4 6-3 Cedric Pioline #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5