H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-1
Alex Corretja and Daniel Vacek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1999 Long Island semifinal 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1999* | Long Island | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-4 6-1 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1996* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daniel Vacek | 6-4 6-4 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |