H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Diego Nargiso H2H: 2-0

Alex Corretja holds a 2–0 lead over Diego Nargiso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1999 Italian Open round of 64 6-1 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alex Corretja
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Diego Nargiso
ITA Age 56 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alex Corretja #7 6-1 7-6(2) Diego Nargiso #143 Match data May 12, 1999* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Alex Corretja #25 6-3 7-5 Diego Nargiso #139 Match data Mar 2, 1995* R32 Mexican Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 1,998 417 278 60.0% 0 2 1 5 9 17
Diego Nargiso #1,400 #67 531 1,702 95 153 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Diego Nargiso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #191 1,511 0 0
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0 1988 11–13 45.8% #90 1,626 0 0
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0 1989 11–19 36.7% #150 1,593 0 0
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,849 0 1 1990 4–6 40.0% #147 1,620 0 0
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,727 0 1 1991 9–14 39.1% #109 1,604 0 0
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 1992 19–22 46.3% #88 1,597 0 0
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,840 0 4 1993 8–23 25.8% #120 1,526 0 0
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 1994 10–18 35.7% #118 1,531 0 0
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 1995 5–10 33.3% #183 1,530 0 0
26 2000 52–19 73.2% #8 1,933 0 14 1996 2–8 20.0% #280 1,507 0 0
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 1997 2–3 40.0% #152 1,546 0 0
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 1998 4–6 40.0% #128 1,563 0 0
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,649 0 17 1999 1–5 16.7% #220 1,523 0 0
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 2000 8–4 66.7% #134 1,625 0 0
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Alex Corretja Diego Nargiso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
18 1992 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 24 20 44 54.5% — — — — — — — — 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1994 4 3 7 57.1% 39 18 57 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1995 1 7 8 12.5% 24 19 43 55.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1998 24 8 32 75.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1994 1 4 5 20.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0%
25 1999 13 10 23 56.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2000 27 12 39 69.2% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2003 7 10 17 41.2% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2004 6 9 15 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — —
31 2005 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 104 237 56.1% 271 144 415 65.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 23 33 30.3% — 33 47 80 41.2% 30 64 94 31.9% 11 15 26 42.3% 21 27 48 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 600/695 of Alex Corretja's and 164/181 of Diego Nargiso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Alex Corretja Diego Nargiso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1992 23/24 1.6 1.0 57.2% 62.8% 47.6% 54.5% 52.6% 56.3% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 42/47 2.0 1.5 56.1% 66.8% 51.5% 60.5% 47.8% 59.6% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 61/66 2.1 1.7 65.4% 66.6% 51.5% 56.3% 43.8% 60.9% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 48/52 1.9 1.2 67.8% 63.4% 49.9% 56.6% 46.5% 59.1% 41.0% 1991 22/23 6.7 5.4 55.7% 74.1% 51.5% 62.6% 37.2% 63.8% 35.6%
22 1996 54/63 3.6 2.4 59.4% 69.1% 52.1% 53.2% 46.2% 62.0% 40.2% 1992 38/41 6.9 4.9 53.9% 75.4% 48.2% 63.7% 48.5% 62.7% 36.2%
23 1997 63/72 3.4 2.6 57.4% 72.3% 53.8% 59.2% 53.3% 64.2% 44.3% 1993 27/31 6.1 4.0 54.0% 72.0% 45.3% 55.7% 36.1% 59.7% 35.7%
24 1998 59/73 4.8 2.3 55.7% 71.9% 52.5% 58.9% 43.5% 63.3% 41.2% 1994 27/28 5.6 5.5 50.7% 69.4% 45.3% 51.7% 46.5% 57.6% 38.8%
25 1999 42/55 4.7 2.3 54.1% 71.2% 54.2% 58.2% 41.2% 63.2% 38.7% 1995 13/15 6.8 6.1 50.9% 72.5% 46.3% 53.1% 49.4% 59.5% 36.3%
26 2000 55/71 5.5 2.3 49.3% 76.1% 54.7% 62.1% 46.8% 65.4% 41.5% 1996 9/10 5.1 7.7 54.5% 68.2% 39.5% 61.9% 36.7% 54.8% 36.1%
27 2001 47/50 5.2 3.7 48.2% 70.7% 52.7% 57.3% 42.9% 61.2% 38.8% 1997 4/5 4.8 3.3 54.8% 72.6% 44.6% 72.0% 22.2% 59.9% 29.6%
28 2002 38/52 4.5 3.1 57.6% 71.7% 55.1% 59.4% 45.5% 64.6% 42.6% 1998 9/10 5.6 3.1 54.8% 73.0% 49.4% 43.9% 47.4% 62.7% 38.4%
29 2003 31/33 4.3 3.0 56.3% 68.0% 48.8% 56.4% 35.8% 59.8% 36.6% 1999 5/6 4.6 3.0 58.5% 63.4% 43.0% 64.9% 31.7% 54.6% 30.8%
30 2004 31/31 3.7 3.3 57.9% 68.2% 50.4% 62.4% 41.7% 60.7% 36.9% 2000 10/12 6.5 4.0 55.1% 79.1% 48.5% 44.7% 51.7% 65.2% 38.7%
31 2005 6/6 1.3 2.7 60.0% 58.1% 44.6% 55.1% 24.5% 54.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 600/695 3.7 2.3 57.3% 69.5% 52.2% 58.1% 45.2% 61.9% 40.8% — 164/248 6.2 4.9 53.7% 72.7% 46.9% 57.3% 43.0% 60.7% 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Alex Corretja Diego Nargiso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1511 117.3 — — — — — +35 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.22
18 1992 1567 127.1 -2.60 +0.75 0.968 49.4% +6 +8 — 46.6% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.54 1988 1627 124.8 — — — — -27 -80 -33 46.9% -0.81 2–5 (29%) 11–1 (92%) — +0.18
19 1993 1658 141.2 -0.53 +1.13 0.997 50.2% -123 +64 — 50.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01 1989 1593 128.6 — — — — -51 +6 -10 40.5% -0.61 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.78
20 1994 1849 150.0 +0.83 +3.51 1.089 51.6% -259 +60 — 58.1% +0.50 23–10 (70%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.60 1990 1621 133.5 — — — — -33 -6 — 37.5% -0.67 2–0 3–3 (50%) — -0.55
21 1995 1727 136.5 -1.41 +2.29 1.002 50.0% -169 +65 — 52.4% +0.15 6–11 (35%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97 1991 1604 129.0 +1.95 -2.04 0.984 49.3% -51 +20 +36 45.6% -0.21 1–6 (14%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.69
22 1996 1784 149.2 +0.51 +2.14 1.060 50.8% -86 +90 -150 55.3% +0.47 10–4 (71%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.11 1992 1597 130.3 +1.50 -1.75 0.972 49.7% +42 -3 +10 51.9% -0.02 4–12 (25%) 9–7 (56%) — +2.22
23 1997 1840 154.1 +2.24 +5.27 1.237 54.3% -146 +167 — 65.9% +1.20 9–10 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.17 1993 1526 127.3 -0.86 -2.64 0.886 47.7% +68 +4 — 33.3% -0.83 2–6 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -0.26
24 1998 1963 157.7 +1.53 +2.59 1.122 52.2% -34 +97 — 63.7% +0.90 21–6 (78%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.17 1994 1532 129.5 -2.33 -0.45 0.916 48.2% +95 -56 +44 38.9% -0.65 5–7 (42%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.26
25 1999 1771 145.8 +1.50 +0.88 1.054 51.0% +5 +184 — 55.6% +0.48 16–8 (67%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.15 1995 1530 121.5 -1.52 -1.31 0.895 48.0% +72 -44 +59 38.9% -0.47 0–3 (0%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.11
26 2000 1933 161.5 +3.18 +4.08 1.199 53.1% -19 +143 — 68.0% +1.14 13–6 (68%) 20–10 (67%) — -1.65 1996 1508 114.3 -4.18 -0.49 0.799 46.0% +85 -38 — 32.3% -1.42 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08
27 2001 1781 141.6 -0.54 +1.48 1.001 50.1% -24 +247 — 57.9% +0.20 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -0.84 1997 1547 124.6 +0.07 -0.53 0.739 45.4% +84 — — 33.3% -0.75 2–0 1–1 — -0.59
28 2002 1851 149.1 +1.45 +3.39 1.201 53.3% -106 +256 — 66.2% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.91 1998 1564 120.6 +0.37 -0.45 1.029 50.3% +93 -104 — 50.0% -0.33 0–4 (0%) 0–1 — +0.18
29 2003 1650 130.9 -1.00 -0.14 0.912 48.2% +41 +144 — 36.3% -0.62 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.20 1999 1524 107.2 -1.01 -2.74 0.678 43.7% — -79 — 23.1% -1.54 0–1 0–3 (0%) — 0.00
30 2004 1623 126.5 -2.17 -0.03 0.939 48.9% +17 +95 — 43.7% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.64 2000 1625 118.8 +1.47 -0.06 1.112 51.4% +19 -21 — 68.0% +0.72 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.50
31 2005 1572 105.8 -2.46 -1.57 0.794 45.4% — +73 — 9.1% -2.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1998 152.9 +0.52 +2.39 1.070 51.3% -50 +121 -150 57.3% +0.52 139–94 (60%) 128–125 (51%) 100.4 -0.56 — 1703 135.7 -0.19 -1.44 0.926 48.6% +29 -23 +20 42.9% -0.51 30–56 (35%) 58–60 (49%) 97.6 -0.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.