H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Alex Corretja vs Feliciano Lopez H2H: 1-3

Feliciano Lopez holds a 3–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Feliciano Lopez leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Feliciano Lopez won the 2005 Estoril third round 6-7(1) 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Alex Corretja
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Feliciano Lopez
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 28, 2005* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Feliciano Lopez #27 6-7(1) 7-6(4) 6-4 Alex Corretja #153 Match data
Apr 16, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Feliciano Lopez #59 7-6(4) 6-3 Alex Corretja #16 Match data
Jan 15, 2003* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Feliciano Lopez #62 6-7(3) 7-6(9) 7-6(6) 6-3 Alex Corretja #19 Match data
Mar 20, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Alex Corretja #18 6-3 6-4 Feliciano Lopez #126 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17
Feliciano Lopez #672 #12 2,415 2,013 497 477 51.0% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Alex Corretja Feliciano Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #546 1,491 0 0
18 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #271 1,480 0 0
19 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0 2001 2–5 28.6% #159 1,520 0 0
20 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1 2002 18–16 52.9% #62 1,699 0 0
21 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1 2003 34–31 52.3% #28 1,841 0 0
22 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1 2004 30–24 55.6% #25 1,833 0 1
23 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4 2005 31–26 54.4% #33 1,759 0 1
24 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9 2006 19–28 40.4% #79 1,676 0 1
25 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9 2007 27–24 52.9% #35 1,804 0 1
26 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14 2008 23–24 48.9% #30 1,829 0 1
27 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15 2009 17–23 42.5% #47 1,724 0 1
28 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17 2010 27–23 54.0% #32 1,807 0 2
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17 2011 35–25 58.3% #20 1,968 0 2
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17 2012 24–26 48.0% #40 1,844 0 2
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17 2013 30–20 60.0% #28 1,914 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2014 40–25 61.5% #14 1,950 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2015 32–26 55.2% #17 1,943 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2016 29–24 54.7% #28 1,890 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2017 25–24 51.0% #36 1,900 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2018 22–21 51.2% #64 1,817 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2019 13–15 46.4% #62 1,824 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #64 1,763 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2021 9–20 31.0% #106 1,595 0 7
40 — — — — — — — 2022 0–11 0.0% #830 1,468 0 7
41 — — — — — — — 2023 3–4 42.9% #468 1,517 0 7