H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Henri Leconte H2H: 1-0
Alex Corretja holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 2-6 4-6 7-5 7-6(6) 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Alex Corretja | 2-6 4-6 7-5 7-6(6) 3-2 (ret.) | Henri Leconte | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |