H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Ivan Lendl H2H: 0-1
Ivan Lendl holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Lendl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1992 Bordeaux fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 1992* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ivan Lendl | 6-1 6-4 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Ivan Lendl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 |