H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Alex Corretja vs Ivo Heuberger H2H: 2-1
Alex Corretja holds a 2–1 lead over Ivo Heuberger in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivo Heuberger leads 1–0 on carpet, while Alex Corretja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Heuberger won the 2002 Basel third round 6-4 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2002* | Basel | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ivo Heuberger | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Aug 30, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 7-5 6-2 6-1 | Ivo Heuberger | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2001* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alex Corretja | 6-3 6-2 | Ivo Heuberger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| Ivo Heuberger | #1,496 | #102 | 398 | 1,639 | 33 | 72 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | Ivo Heuberger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #222 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 2002 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #155 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |