H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Alex Corretja vs James Blake H2H: 1-2
James Blake holds a 2–1 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, James Blake won the 2002 Washington quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2002* | Washington | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | James Blake | 6-4 6-4 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | James Blake | 5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 6-2 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2000* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Alex Corretja | 6-3 6-1 | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Alex Corretja | James Blake | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 |